10/15/2019 Automatic Display Control (adc): Automatic Display Control Allows The I1 Profiler Good For Mac?
Jun 10, 2011 - ADC stands for “Automatic Display Control”. Displays it is accomplished using other commands that allows ADC to control the display.
I didn't see this when I installed the software or elsewhere in any of the wizards so i wanted to share it here. Before profiling your display go to the Preferences settings under the ColorMunki Display button in the main toolbar) and check to see that your settings are correct.
Make sure you specify the type of backlight technology your display is using otherwise you. As forthe rest of the settigns the Tone Response Curve should be 2.2.
![]()
I am currently using ICC Profile version 2 instead of version 4 ( but I'd like to see a well reasoned argument to switch to version 4); I have the 'Achieve luminance value using video LUT's' option checked (again a good argument not to would be appreciated); and have ADC (Automatic Display Control) active as well. Thanks for the tips. I just ordered the ColorMunki Photo for my 27' iMac that is arriving next week. I will be calibrating my Epson R1800 with it. I've been using an old i1 Display 2 with Match for years on my Dell. How are the results from the ColorMunki Photo for matching screen to prints on the iMac?
It appears to be a different unit from the ColorMunki Display. Are they the same unit in a different package to add the printer profiling? Also, would there be any benefit to upgrade or add the i1Display Pro just reviewed on the LL today? Thanks for the tips. I just ordered the ColorMunki Photo for my 27' iMac that is arriving next week. I will be calibrating my Epson R1800 with it.
I've been using an old i1 Display 2 with Match for years on my Dell. How are the results from the ColorMunki Photo for matching screen to prints on the iMac? It appears to be a different unit from the ColorMunki Display.
Are they the same unit in a different package to add the printer profiling? Also, would there be any benefit to upgrade or add the i1Display Pro just reviewed on the LL today?
Both the hardware and software (at least the software has a different user interface) in the ColorMunki Photo (CMP) differs from the ColorMunki Display (CMD). The CMP hardware is a photospectrometer while the CMP hardware is a colorimeter. I also have the i1 Display Pro but haven't installed the software or worked with it yet. Unless you need the additional functions of the i1 Display Pro you will likely be just fine with either the CMD or CMP kit. Keith Cooper has really good reviews of the ColorMunki Photo ( ), ColorMunki Display ( ), and i1 Display Pro on his site. Based on my own independent findings, made prior to reading his review agree with his for the most part. Both the hardware and software (at least the software has a different user interface) in the ColorMunki Photo (CMP) differs from the ColorMunki Display (CMD).
The CMP hardware is a photospectrometer while the CMP hardware is a colorimeter. I also have the i1 Display Pro but haven't installed the software or worked with it yet. Unless you need the additional functions of the i1 Display Pro you will likely be just fine with either the CMD or CMP kit. Keith Cooper has really good reviews of the ColorMunki Photo ( ), ColorMunki Display ( ), and i1 Display Pro on his site. Based on my own independent findings, made prior to reading his review agree with his for the most part. It depends on your needs. The ColorMunki Photo does a fine job with OS X machines but the i1 Photo Pro has some handy tools in it's box.
Here are two: I print with a Canon iPF6300 and use Canon's Export plug-in for Photoshop CS5. I mention this because it bypasses the OS X print driver. A) i1 Profiler allows you to a) print more patches ( 1200 is the threshold number i use to get very smooth profiles (I also tried using 400, 800, 1600 and 2000 patch targets - more patches get more smoothness but not enough in my opinion to justify the extra effort) and b.) export the target pages to Photoshop where I can print without a profile assigned.
![]()
B) I tried making profiles going through a) i1 Profiler (which like the ColorMunki Photo uses the OS X print driver) and through the Photoshop Print routine ( OS X print driver again) as wel las the Canon Export module. The difference in L values for the black point was very different.
On Moab Lasal Exhibition Luster 300 the black point L value was 3,0,0 using the Canon Export module and was 9,0,0 when going through the OS X print driver. Whether my experiences make any difference to you will depend on how you print, what you print with and what you print on, and of course the subject and your treatment of it.
Comments are closed.
|
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |